top of page
Featured Perspectives

Battles over blood quantum and ‘best interests’ resurface the untold history of America’s Indian Adoption Era - a time when nearly one-third of children were removed from tribal communities nationwide.  As political scrutiny over Indian child welfare intensifies, an adoption survivor helps others find their way home through song and ceremony.

Sandy Profile Image.png
corner_protector_1_edited.png
Sandy White Hawk
Sicangu Lakota | Founding Director, First Nations Repatriation Institute
 
For Sandy White Hawk, the story of America’s Indian Adoption Era is not one of saving children but of destroying families and tribes. At 18 months of age, Sandy was removed from her Sicangu Lakota relatives and placed with white missionaries over 400 miles from the reservation. Growing up as the only brown girl in a small Wisconsin town, Sandy’s cultural identity was rejected, leaving her feeling ugly, alone and unworthy of love.

After a 30-year struggle through abuse and recovery, Sandy set out to restore the missing pieces of her stolen past and reclaim the Lakota identity she was taught to disown. She soon discovered that her adoption was not an isolated case but part of a nationwide assimilative movement that targeted American Indian children. 

 

Through Sandy’s journey of coming home, she learned the powerful role that traditional song and ceremony can play in healing this intergenerational wound. Today, she is an international child welfare advocate and has assisted countless displaced relatives and their families through the process of reunification. Blood Memory explores the impact reunification can have on communal healing, as Sandy helps organize the first annual Welcome Home Ceremony for Adopted and Foster Relatives of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe - the community from which she was removed over 60 years ago.

Mark Profile Image.png
corner_protector_1_edited.png
Mark Fiddler
Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians Private Practice Attorney
 
 
While Sandy works to address the intergenerational wound caused by forced family separation, a buzz begins to form around Mark Fiddler - a private adoption attorney who was catapulted to national recognition for his involvement in the 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case, Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl. This landmark case challenged modern implications of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) - a law passed in 1978 to halt the unwarranted removals of Sandy's generation
Many Indian child welfare advocates cite the Baby Girl case as a prime example of how a corrupt and biased 'adoption industry' continues to sidestep tribal sovereignty unpunished.  Though Mark began his career as a staunch proponent of ICWA and worked to protect the rights of Indigenous families into the 1990s, he now finds himself leading a 'coordinated attack' set on dismantling the Act. With a strategic outcropping of state and federal petitions, Mark is poised for a return to the U.S. Supreme Court, where not only ICWA but Indian heritage, will be put on trial.
bottom of page